Hi, please

Tag Archives: 1-travelogue

The Trap in Psychology and Education

Watching the Trap at this point in my life is timely on so many levels. For the obvious reasons of the way the world is right now, and also for the reason that as an individual, I am at a point where I question everything, especially what freedom and liberty mean to me.

There are so many ways in which this documentary got me thinking, and it is hard for me to choose one to talk about here. But, based on my background and what I am studying right now, the easy parallels for me to draw are to psychology and education.

The way that psychiatrists and economists reduced human beings to machines that can be analyzed and dissected by symptoms and behaviors mirrors the early behaviorist and conditioning approach in psychology as pioneered by Pavlov (you can also play a dog drooling game here!), Watson, and Skinner. It even extends to the popular cognitivist analogy which took advantage of the age of the computer to approach the workings of the mind as though it were a computer. At the time, these approaches made sense, and I believe that both situations are examples of people trying to make sense of who we are and how we work. I don’t think it is inherently wrong, but, having said that, I do believe that the eagerness with which to apply these ‘theories’ to populations with the promise of a ‘better life’ is definitely stretching it. Jerome Bruner’s article (Bruner, J. (1990). The proper study of man. In Acts of meaning. London: Harvard University Press.) talks about how computers were used as an analogy for the human mind. Howard Gardner also gives a great overview of how the landscape of psychological thought changed over time. (Gardner, H. 1985 – The Mind’s New Science, Chapter 3)

It also reminds me of the whole quantitative vs qualitative methods of research. Quantitative methods were born from the ‘hard’ sciences as they are sometimes called – chemistry, physics and other physical sciences. This being a proved method of achieving results, was forced into the social sciences and was set as a standard by which social scientists could ‘prove’ human behaviors, etc. Of course, with time, it became obvious that following a purely quantitative methodology ignored many aspects of human behavior and culture. Guba and Lincoln wrote a great article about the ‘received view’ as they called quantitative methodology and the pros and cons of these, focusing on the fact that these methods completely ignored individual differences and hence could not really be applicable to the population. (Guba, E G. & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.).

There are many parallels from an educational standpoint as well. One that stands out for me and relates most to ‘revolution’ is Paulo Freire’s Pedagogy of the Oppressed.Besides other wonderful ideals that were also followed by revolutionaries like Guevara, Freire talks about the ‘banking’ method of education in which an elite, knowledgeable group of people ‘deposit’ factual knowledge into learners without supporting any real ‘learning’. He espouses a reciprocal relationship between teacher and student in which the teacher is also the student and the student is also the teacher – both working together to create a learning environment in which the teacher is not a dictator but a facilitator and guide who is also learning or relearning along with the student.

Overally, I loved what Nash said towards the end that although he stood by his Game Theory, he believes that people wrongly emphasized certain aspects of it to their advantage which should not have happened.

Through the documentary, and also through history, I think that human beings, in their search for balance, take to one or another viewpoint in the belief that it will help them achieve an ‘ideal’. Of course, this ideal is planted by the media, politicians, generations before… everyone wants to be better than they are right now and each person’s definition of that ‘better’ is different. I think it’s healthy to explore what makes us work as a race and to attempt to take on certain ways of living, but I do certainly believe that government, while it has its important roles to play in some aspects of life, should not be in charge of telling us what’s good for us. Berlin said it well when he said he didn’t want to be treated like a school boy and told what to do!

Game Theory in Social Interactions Online: A Case Study

As I was watching Adam Curtis’s The Trap, the one thing that really interested me was the application of game theory to everyday interaction, particularly in the theories of von Hayek, the testing of Nash’s Prisoner’s Dilemma and in the work of RD Laing.

In the documentary, Curtis talks about how the many applications of numbers, and particularly game theory, to human behavior always fails. Irrespective of whether this application is a good idea or not, it seems to me that, in everyday life, there is no practical way to test this. The testing methods he showed were fundamentally flawed: if game theory is correct, humans wouldn’t be trying to achieve the best result in every individual situation, but the best result overall. In this case, it might actually be disadvantageous to go for the most “logical” solution in every situation, because it might harm social standing in the long run.

Additionally, in a group setting, the dilemma of whether to cooperate or betray becomes more complex. In the article “Communication, Coordination, and Camaraderie in World of Warcraft” by Mark G. Chen, he explains that

A common feature of many models of [social dilemmas] is that the whole community benefits when a certain number of people cooperate. What this means is that someone could defect— make the self-serving choice by free riding—so long as enough other people are cooperating, but if too many people free ride, the whole community loses any benefits. It is relatively easy to show how two people can rationalize cooperating with each other (by not betraying each other and maximizing their benefit over time). It is much harder to convince someone who belongs to a larger community that cooperating makes sense. (Chen 49)

Considering the topic of this course, I immediately considered how this might apply to virtual interaction. After all, the ideal testing parameters for something like this would be a completely anonymous world, where no one has any idea who anyone else is, in an incredibly large community, where everyone is entirely unaccountable for their behavior: basically, the internet.  Using the film as a jumping-off point, I explored how von Hayek, Nash, and Laing’s ideas might or might not apply more clearly to virtual interaction. Read More »

The Trap as a loop: Floating between positive and negative liberty

Parts 1 and 2 of Curtis’ mini-series, The Trap, do a great job explaining the ways in which western culture is permeated by determinism (mathematical, technological, biological, economic, and otherwise).   Curtis shows us how the Nash Equilibrium found a home in foreign policy (through Cold War era Brinksmanship); then wove its way through pop psychology; then “mashed up” with Watson & Crick’s discoveries on DNA to usher in a new vision of the human being as a simple collection of “selfish” genes; culminating in the era of market-driven democracy in the US, and New Labor in the UK.  It isn’t until Part 3, however, that Isaiah Berlin’s theory of negative and positive liberty pulls this mode of thought into clearer focus; we can read it as the manifestation of the West’s struggle between these two ideological poles.  Hence the full title of the documentary: “The Trap: What Happened to Our Dream of Freedom.”

Read More »

Psychiatry and Pharmaceuticals as “The Trap”

I’ve never considered myself an extremely political person, but Adam Curtis’ The Trap was overall an interesting documentary that had its high and low points. What particularly stood out to me was Curtis’ discussion of psychiatry and pharmaceuticals in the first, but especially the second, parts of the documentary. Other than that, the only other thing that stood out to me in this film was Curtis’ obsession with scores from John Carpenter films (I honestly could not pay attention to the portion of the documentary accompanied by the Halloween theme).

Although I don’t have a specific interest in psychology, I’ve always been skeptical about what I put into my body and am hesitant to even take aspirin. Additionally, one of my close friends works in a psychology lab and is on her way to becoming a clinical psychologist, so this portion of the film really struck me and hearing her “professional” insight on Curtis’ thoughts were interesting. Read More »

The Trap and The Great Depression

According to the Centers for Disease Control, anti-depressants have become the most commonly prescribed drugs in the United States. After watching Adam Curtis’ The Trap, it was fascinating to learn where it all began. 

I couldn’t help but parallel the segment of the rise of psychiatry movement, which in the late 1980’s and early 1990’s put into place a checklist of symptoms to determine if someone was “mentally ill” with depression or anxiety, with what we see in our country today. By answering the questions on this checklist created by Dr. Robert Spitzer, consumers were able to discover whether or not they were dealing with “abnormal” emotion and functioning in the way humans were meant to function. It was later realized that this guide took only an objective look at these symptoms. The feelings were never contextualized within the consumer’s life, and normal emotions such as sadness, fear and anxiety were easily medicalized.

While the checklist created by Spitzer is no longer in place, I see a similarity between this and the direct-to-consumer advertising of anti-depressants (and many, many other pharmaceuticals) we are now prestened with, often leading to self-diagnosis. Read More »