I apologize for this conclusion, the format AND the lateness – I had planned a video with images and swooshy lettering and such, but the tech gods were not smiling on me this time round. hence a podcast summarizing what I’ve gathered from talking to and gathering info from various people in the technology and education field, trying to get at what they think is the most pressing problem in education right now…
Author Archives: sava
interesting patterns emerging regarding what people think are good and bad uses of tech in ed, current state of tech in ed, and future of tech in ed. I will hopefully wrap it all up in a beautiful way for the last installment.
a couple of points:
- digital video seems to be having a positive impact on education
- training seems to be a HUGE issue – the bad examples seem to point to lack of support for teachers
- the future will likely be more individualized - and students will shape a lot of their learning using new technologies
Note: Doing this was odd and difficult for me on a couple of levels. It’s incredibly weird to be writing a summary on a review of a book. But I’ve tried my best to capture what both reviewers are saying and the authors’ response. Not to mention the subject area is still very new to me so that meant reading these things 4-5 times!
I have to say this: after reading, I ‘got’ what was going on, but it is so so hard to articulate it. I found myself explaining it verbally to the bf because that helped to form my thoughts on the subject. A lot of the references are really beyond me – but Wikipedia is awesome! Seriously – a lot of this would not have made sense for me had it not been for Wikipedia. How did they do it in the old days??!!
Oh, and I had various stupid stupid tech issues with just the write-up – believe it or not, I lost my file because I was writing it in TextEdit and not saving because I just usually copy it over, and then computer crashed on me and I lost most of this post and had to recreate it. Sigh. See y’all in class!
The Exploit: A Theory of Networks, Alexander R. Galloway and Eugene Thacker
[and here's a preview...]
Review by: Daniel Gilfillan
Daniel Gilfillan describes the central point of the book as moving “the discussion beyond the emancipatory promise of the network to light upon the inherent systems of control and power relations that also inhabit it, and allow it to thrive”. Galloway and Thacker move away from the general viewpoint that networks are democratic and libertarian and instead call on us to view the network as having a power system that needs to be ‘exploited’ in order to break away from its controls. The authors talk of “the exploit” – a point within in a network which can be used to reframe the power structure of the network.
Note: The readings this week were hard for me to grasp, so I apologize if I didn’t ‘get’ some of the things in the articles. This subject is totally new to me and I still feel like I don’t really ‘get’ it… I look forward to talking about this in class!
Networks: A Talk by Anna Nagurney
This talk is a great introduction to networks and network theory, the different kinds of networks and the application of network theory. At the end, the speaker talks about a new paradigm for the study of networks – Supernetworks.
Background of Networks:
- Pervasive and essential for functioning of societies and economies.
- Networks exist all around us: business, science, social systems, technology, and education and provide the infrastructure for communication, production and transportation.
Examples of Physical Networks:
- Transportation is a good (and big) example of a networks – transportation allows for face-to-face interaction, access to consumer products and food, etc. transportation networks include highway, railroad, and waterways (for freight). Transportation networks work over roads, rails, water, and air.
- Communication Networks – allowing for communication and connection with our communities and international communities. These networks have also changed our lives – personal and professional. Communication took place based on available resources – from smoke signals and pigeons to computers and phones. The earliest forms of the application of network theory is from Roman times dealing with congestion – constraints on what time chariots can come into the city!
- A type of network that isn’t studied as much (maybe not any more, in the face of the Global Warming and oil shortage issues?) are Energy networks. Ms. Nagurney talks about the blackout of 2003 and the problems that caused.
this week I learned the difficulties of coordinating meeting times. every time and date we set up fell through, but thanks to advanced alien technology, I was able to get my interviewee, Francisco Cervantes, to record his interview for me which I then edited down for your viewing pleasure this week.
the connections between how we learned technology and how we teach it is getting clearer… I also love the answer to the last question – you’ll have to watch to know what I’m talking about! =)
(Gah. I had many problems with the video. but it’s up, finally, I think. they’re still ‘processing’ the video… Forgive!)
Here’s my first interview attempt! I was able to borrow my friend’s Flip Video and interview someone who preferred to be somewhat anonymous, more out of bashfulness than any need to hide his identity, but it is something I wanted to respect.
As you can see, the interview is a little rambling and the subject is a little too broad – but it’s my first, and I think that after doing a few, I will be able to better hone my interviewing skillz and video editing skillz and also narrow the focus. Part of the interview process is to realize which questions work and which don’t – something I’ve already figured out a little, but this is also a record of sorts of my journey through the process!
Comments, pointers, suggestions for further interview questions are welcome!
PS: I used flip video, ffmpegX to convert the video, iMovie to edit and add title stuff. Took quite a while because I’m by no means an expert! Used the bf’s computer because mine’s so old and doesn’t have all this stuff =(

my kitty kat, yes.
Yes, this is an extremely general question, but here’s my angle – I’m interested to see what are the earliest memories people have of adopting technology, and what caused them to do so. I want more than general answers – which will require some interviewing skillz, but well, that’s what I’m supposed to develop, no?
The target audience for this is people who started using computers or technology (and I’m using these terms interchangeably now, but will settle on one based on the output of my interviews) around the early 90’s when they began to be more accessible and ubiquitous. But I also know a few people who are late adopters – and this might be the more interesting group.
I plan on interviewing different people and asking questions like:
- What is your earliest memory of using a computer?
- Is there a ‘one event’ or ‘one person’ who inspired them/made them/helped them use the technology?
- What made them take that step?
- What helped you overcome that ‘fear’ of technology?
- How has the way you were introduced to computers/technology changed or affected the way you help others start using technology?
And so on. My expectation is to hear about teachers, parents, friends, competition, envy, ambition, need, etc., that made them take that step – I’m interested to see how that occurred. And how that translates into their helping people learn today. AND, how that leads to their ‘tech identity’ today.
As I mentioned earlier, this does seem broad, but I was to start and see where it takes me. Look for my first interview later today/early tomorrow!
Came across this event that kind of connects with this week’s theme of the networked city – especially the walking as conversation with the city concept:
A Moral Aquarium on 37th Street is a storefront diorama by Dillon de Give where real life dramas proposed by regular everyday people will be used to create a presentation of NYC pedestrian life transposed onto a cast of undersea characters.
The project unfolds in two phases. In the construction performance, worker polyp and zooplankton volunteers help build the coral reef, assemble undersea costumes, and collect street stories from passersby. As the reef nears completion and stories are compiled, a program of presentations will begin. The schedule of narratives, scenes, dances etc. will be posted in the window each day.
The Moral Aquarium will keep regular hours with a morality tale highlight each evening. The space will also serve as a venue for aquarium themed performances by guest artists.
Nov 4-10 — 8am-2pm
Nov 11-17 — 1-8pm
chashama 266 Window Space, 266 West 37th Street b/w 7th and 8th Ave.
FREE and open to the public
Opening party Friday Nov 6. 6-9pm
Supported by: chashama
Facebook event page
So, after spending some time on various education-themed Waves (I had to limit myself because it started becoming a little overwhelming), I haven’t changed my mind drastically regarding the future of Wave. Or have I?
Yes it’s kinda cool.
Yes there’s potential.
Yes I’ve spent more time on Wave than on fb the last few days, believe it!
BUT… it’s still seriously early days. There is excitement, there is buzz – but will it come to anything?
I’m still trying to see it as a serious contender to tools currently being used in support of education and knowledge building. Here are some thoughts…
But first, here is an AWESOME indication of how awesome Wave is!
Collaborative Note-Taking
So far the only strong case that makes sense to me is for collaborative note-taking. I mentioned this in my earlier post, and I still see this as a strong contender. Having a class all take notes in one place and be able to comment/correct/add multimedia in support of content seems like a really really cool idea. At the end, you have this great resource made up of class notes, additional info, commentary, discussion – all in one place. And I think that it being limited by just the class will keep the Wave to a manageable size.
The structure I see working, which is supported by many who are having this conversation in Wave, is this:
- The teacher can set up the wave and invite students to it. The Wave could include the outline for the lesson that day – maybe even the slide headings and such that the teacher plans to cover.
- Provide roles to the students: students can individually or in groups play roles like recording what teacher says (note-taker), spell checking, fact checking, supporting evidence gathering, etc.
- Students and teachers alike can add comments or questions that don’t get addressed as part of the course of the class – maintaining what is also known as a Backchannel.
This would allow for the whole class to have a great reference in terms of notes for when they need to go over notes for an exam or paper or what-have-you. While the most construction would take place during class, this is something that could continue outside of class – but it isn’t imperative that it does.
A problem that some of the Waves foresee and I agree with, is that there will be slackers who benefit from this. But I think that as with all or most 2.0 stuff, there are always slackers or non-contributors who benefit from things (how many of us have actually done anything on Wikipedia?) Also, some educators talked about forcing kids to participate but others were quick to note that kids don’t like being ‘forced’ into anything.
Whatever the drawbacks, I do think that this is a more productive collaboration tool. I had to contribute to a Wiki for a class and it was really really boring. Even contributing to a blog is not as rewarding (no offense to this class) – the only way I feel engaged is if I have an RSS feed or turn on email notifications for comments. In a Wave – you can see people doing things in real time. There is something extremely compelling about that and I would like to think that it adds to a sense of community and could potentially act as a motivating factor in the collaborative note-taking scenario.
(There doesn’t seem to be a way for updates to a Wave to get to me other than just keeping my Wave window open and monitoring it. As a time-effective method this fails. The only way I can think of is similar to getting email updates, but that is the same as a blog. I’m sure something will come up – or we’ll get as addicted to Wave as we are to FB and keep it open all the time!)
I really really want to test this out in a real life situation and plan to test it with 4 of my classmates in another class. The output of that might be too late to report on in terms of this travelogue (some of them just got their accounts), but I will post my findings and feelings if there’s something interesting.
Assessment
This is a term that is so so so important in education – not always because teachers and educators think it is, but, um, NCLB (and check this and this out too if you’re interested). I won’t say anything more on the subject.
Regardless of the reasons for assessments, they are still a part of our educational reality today. How can Wave support this? I have one word for you: Playback.
Let’s take the collaborative note-taking example. After class, a teacher could playback the Wave to see how students collaborated and which ones did what and how much. A lot of our classes have 10% or 15% of our grade alloted to ‘active class participation’. I still haven’t clearly figured out what that means, but it still seems like a judgement call on the teacher’s (or TA’s) part.
Having said that, the Playback function of a Wave can indicated which students are actively participating in a discussion or as part of the whole Wave. But what about someone who’s role is merely ’spell-checker’ or ‘fact-checker’ you ask? Who said that students had to have the same roles for every class?? Over a period of time, one would be able to see what the dynamics of the whole year or semester look like. I think there is a LOT of potential to this approach.
Overall Comments
I have to say that since my last post, my skepticism is decreasing. But it won’t go away entirely until we can see and show how useful a tool Google Wave is. People were talking about how useful this could be for other uses in business – there was a lawyer who commented about how they could use it to collaboratively build a case file and such. I’m also seeing potential as an ethnographic or qualitative research tool. I do believe that there’s something to Google Wave.
Is it a game changer? I don’t know.
Google Docs was a game changer.
Gmail was a game changer.
Wikis were a game changer.
Blogs were a game changer.
All these tools helped us do what we already do… but better. Google Wave definitely has the potential to add to the general educational environment, but how much? There are already so many tools that support learning in similar ways. I think one of the key characteristics of Wave is that it is real time. Whether it is a serious game changer or not is yet to be seen.
Will I continue to use it? Hells yeah. Maybe even more than FB!
(Note: The interview with the educator using Wave was cancelled because he’s at the EDUCAUSE conference in Denver.)
Interesting conference at The New School:
From their site:
On November 12 through 14, Eugene Lang College The New School for Liberal Arts will host an international conference titled, “The Internet as Playground and Factory,” which will explore the meaning and changing face of labor in the digital era.
The event seeks to advance the conversation about digital media beyond technological advances and commercial applications to touch upon vital issues facing the future of Internet users. For three days, 90 theorists, artists, legal scholars, activists, students, programmers, historians, and social media experts will join to re-evaluate what constitutes unpaid labor, value, leisure, play, fun, and exploitation in an economy that is increasingly driven by the expropriation of all our blogging, data entries in online profiles, and submitted photos and videos. The conference will be comprised of discussions, panels, presentations, a film screening, a playroom, a conference game, and a re-enactment of Facebook by a performance artist.
Location: Anna-Maria and Stephen Kellen Auditorium, Sheila C. Johnson Design Center, 66 Fifth Avenue
Admission: Register online at http://digitallabor.org/registration/.