I tried to keep this short, as I’m sure everyone’s crazy busy with finals. Have fun debating Dvorak in the comments!
This is it – this will be the last brief in the semester.
Wiki Marathon
For week I would like you to work on the wiki and make sure the structure and content of the wiki together with your contribution pages reflects the hard personal and collective work you’ve been doing. I want you guys to do more work earlier and not wait for the last moment on this as collaboration is hard and the process should be given some time to take shape and materialize. Please make sure you make most of your contributions by Saturday and devote Sunday-Tuesday to edit, structure and further substantiate the collective work of the class.
Next week’s reading will focus on the potential (?) of Postnationalism presented by the networked public sphere and on the digital divide through the case study of the OLPC.
Required Reading:
- Nicolas Negroponte, “Interview with Riz Khan” Al-Jazeera October 2007
(by the way, Riz’s show is recommended in general) - One Laptop per Child Doesn’t Change the World / John C. Dvorak
- Give me rice, but give me a laptop too / Bill Thompson
- Frost, Catherine “Internet Galaxy Meets Postnational Constellation: Prospects for Political Solidarity After the Internet” (a pdf will be emailed to you, please do not share, sorry)
- Sara’s summary + your comment
Recommended Reading:
- (optional, just to get a more updated note on the OLPC) OLPC XO-2 cancelled: tablet will be developed next / Jack Schofield, Guardian (Nov 4th, 09)
- The OLPC wikipedia page, kept pretty updated with the project’s history and current state.
Sara:
- Read the essay & articles and view the presentation
- Optionally Highlight and annotate the reading to help its accessibility for the rest of you.
- Summarize it for us in a nicely accessible post to be published by Sunday 4pm, ideally running some threads between them.
- Be prepared to present the article and lead the discussion in class.
- Think of questions to lead off the discussion
- Post to del.icio.us some links that expand the discussion either about the text or about key themes in it.
Tapscott – The Impending Demise of the University
“Universities are finally losing their monopoly on higher learning, as the web inexorably becomes the dominant infrastructure for knowledge serving both as a container and as a global platform for knowledge exchange between people.”
“The Detroit of higher learning.”

Eisenwalzwerk (Moderne Cyklopen) - Adolf Friedrich Erdmann von Menzel
In a NY Times editorial, Columbia professor Mark Taylor said that universities are becoming obsolete because they:
- produce a product for which there is no market (teaching positions)
- develop skills for which there is diminishing demand (research in subfields /publication in journals)
- rapidly rising cost (sometimes well over $100,000 in student loans)
I apologize for this conclusion, the format AND the lateness – I had planned a video with images and swooshy lettering and such, but the tech gods were not smiling on me this time round. hence a podcast summarizing what I’ve gathered from talking to and gathering info from various people in the technology and education field, trying to get at what they think is the most pressing problem in education right now…
Count how many times I say access….
http://www.vimeo.com/7926185I’m frustrated. I’ve been trying to create my final comic and Pixton has been down, unable to save anything. I created 3 frames, which you can see below (click to view full size):
In this travelogue, I’ve explored ways the internet-facilitated humor builds communities and draws people together across boundaries they might not usually cross. I’ve showed ways in which internet humor is invading the offline world. And I’ve also discussed networked features of humor on the internet (multidirectional communication, informality, chatter, and lingering distribution).
But I still haven’t answered the big question: “is the internet making us funnier?”.
Well?
If we’re only talking about quantity and speed, then sure. Online, we can easily create and share humor, and we can do it really really quickly!
But qualitatively funnier? In the real world? Maybe I could begin to answer this question if I had hours and months and years to do a content analysis of sitcoms or movies or standup comedy or books over the decades.
But honestly, I think the answer is no. When it comes down to it, people are still making the same kind of jokes, they’re just finding new ways to share and comment upon them. I think this video from the Library of Congress makes my point.
Guys! People have been messing with cats since at least the 1880s! Which is when this video was made. Seriously.
I’d also like to mention: while there’s a ton of stuff that’s funny out there on the internet, there’s a lot of content that really, really isn’t. In some simplistic way, wouldn’t funny and unfunny create a counterbalance to one another?
Anyway, in an effort to create make something funnier, by building upon something that’s already out there, and then distribute it far and wide using, check out this hilarious video uploaded onto youtube, a source of networked comedy!
For the last post of this travelogue, I connected with a longtime WELL member to get her thoughts on the site.
Please enable Javascript and Flash to view this Blip.tv video.
After the jump, some follow up questions and answers I received from her last night, (too late to put into my video…sorry for so much text!).


