Difference between revisions of "The Market"

From Dead Media Archive
Jump to: navigation, search
(The Market as a Medium)
Line 33: Line 33:
 
== The Market as a Medium ==
 
== The Market as a Medium ==
  
To what extent can the market be understood as a medium?  Fernand Braudel argues that the market mediates between material life and economic life.
+
To what extent can the market be understood as a medium?  Fernand Braudel argues that the market mediates between material life and economic life.  But the possibility of mediation requires a prior separation between the two entities being mediated, which are in this case material and economic life.  A Marxist reading of capitalism might suggest that material and economic life are not separate, that economic life is a condition of possibility for material life.
  
 
=== The Market as a Dead Medium ===
 
=== The Market as a Dead Medium ===

Revision as of 15:46, 14 April 2008

Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination
What was once a spatial locality with a distinct form and use is now pure function with no distinct materiality
Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination
Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination

Theatricality in the creation of a consuming subject

Mail-order

Semiotics in the Liberation of Function from Form

Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination
Robert Venturi's "Recommendation for a monument" from Learning From Las Vegas, 1972


... ours is not the environment for heroic communication through pure architecture. Each medium has its day, and the rhetorical environmental statements of our time – civic, commercial, or residential – will come from media more purely symbolic, perhaps less static and more adaptable to the scale of our environment. The iconography and mixed media of roadside commercial architecture will point the way if we will look. Housing for the elderly on the Oak Street Connector, if it had to be a monument, would have been more economical, socially responsible and amenable as a conventional apartment building,lost by the side of the expressway, with a big sign on top blinking, I AM A MONUMENT. Decoration is cheaper.

- Robert Venturi,"Learning From Las Vegas," 1972



Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination
The Upper Strip Looking North
Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination
A Vegas chapel: function legitimated through semiotics

When Robert Venturi looked to the vernacular architecture on the Las Vegas strip in the late 1960's, he saw a resurrection of symbolism in the built environment that had seemed destined for extinction in the wake of architectural modernism. Whereas the Bauhaus' legacy in modernism had stripped buildings of ornament in an attempt to unify form with function, Venturi was amazed to find a Las Vegas strip dotted with generic buildings differentiated only by elaborate ornamental signs designating the unique functions and identities of otherwise identical spaces.

The Vegas strip not only violated a progression away from decoration (which led many to credit Venturi's text as the first postmodern architectural manifesto) but brought more clearly into focus the impact of the automobile upon architecture that needed to be identified from greater distances over shorter durations of time. Whereas the heroic communication of pure architecture had in the past led to forms and facades which - albeit imperfectly - communicated the activities contained within them, Venturi noted that in a land of highways and commercial strips the same system of (road) signs that enabled standardized navigation of an entire continent also enabled a faster recognition of the buildings and spaces one passed by. The vital necessity of introducing semiotic distinctions between buildings exemplified the spatial distortions that accompany accelerated movement and the distribution of communities across expanding territories.

Whereas the built environment brought countless aspects of human activity into existence by anchoring them in physical space, what Venturi exposed was the cultural appropriation of semiotic systems to designate spaces whose distinctive architecture had not yet been invented. In his iconic “Recommendation for a monument” his sarcastic suggestion that decoration upon generic form was the most ethical and economic method of design, exposed the complete lack of subtlety in designs that managed to serve specific functions in the absence of architectural innovation. Rather than create a home for new human activity, it was clear that one need only name a space in order for it to serve a specific function. Although modular, multipurpose, space had been realized long ago behind the glass curtain walls of modern skyscapers, after 1972, one could not escape the vulgar conclusion that the space itself was a nostalgic theatre enabling the suspension of disbelief which designated the offices of one box from the warehouse or monument of another.

In essence, symbolism had invaded space rendering residual communicative modalities in architectural form (the steeple, the column, the storefront) which directed activities within them unnecessary. In a traditional town one might recognize a church by a steeple, and civic institutions by classical architecture – but in Las Vegas one needed only to read a sign that read “CHAPEL” and a marriage could be performed. Resistance to the glass curtain and the modernist box need not be overcome by a radical re-education of a public in modernist aesthetics, but by the complete removal of ambiguity through the ultimate abstraction of the sign. Buildings had entered a realm of mediation, and the Las Vegas strip presented an intermediate phenomenon whereby one could could navigate a foreign landscape locate a desired place.

Venturi's Monument, like a Vegas chapel, anticipates the remediation of spatial phenomena in immaterial spaces and illustrates that function itself is not material, but something performed by actors engaged in a collective fiction. Once it was plainly clear that all the world was a stage, it followed that with the proper, scripting, semiotic device, the market no longer needed to be a specific locality in order to function as a market.



The Market as a Medium

To what extent can the market be understood as a medium? Fernand Braudel argues that the market mediates between material life and economic life. But the possibility of mediation requires a prior separation between the two entities being mediated, which are in this case material and economic life. A Marxist reading of capitalism might suggest that material and economic life are not separate, that economic life is a condition of possibility for material life.

The Market as a Dead Medium

To what extent can the market be characterized as a dead medium?

In order to answer this question, one must consider different definitions and uses of the word, market.

Market as a site of buying and selling: To the extent that the market is understood to be a spatial entity, or object, containing/enclosing acts of economic exchange, the market is dead.






The purpose of any space is determined by both the symbols used to designate where one is (ie an open for business sign), and the practices that take place there. In "Learning From Las Vegas," Robert Venturi takes a close look at how the Vegas Strip (in the late 60's) consisted of buildings that were differentiated primarily by flashy signs decorating unoriginal buildings (what he called the "decorated shed." He traced the phenomenon to the impact of speed on architecture - mainly that in a landscape where one drives past buildings, signs enable one to differentiate one space from another at a faster speed than differentiated architectures could (which is why signs matter so much for businesses on highways).

What makes this so interesting is that when semiotics are reintroduced into architecture, communicating the specific use of a generic space, buildings enter a mediated realm - And I think that's key here - that when people believe they're in a market when they see a "market" sign, it enables the use of a spatial semiotic to successfully mediate the entire space provided that the same activity occurs - which is really just to say that the Las Vegas strip is this intermediate phenomenon whereby we all can find what we want in foreign places, and that's precisely the mechanism by which we can create a market without the actual space of a market (a shopping cart icon does the trick!).