Difference between revisions of "Bootleg Video"

From Dead Media Archive
Jump to: navigation, search
(A Brief History of Magnetic Tape)
(Fake Timeshifting)
Line 53: Line 53:
 
* locations/origins of artifacts
 
* locations/origins of artifacts
 
===Fake Timeshifting===
 
===Fake Timeshifting===
We automatically, and mistakenly, tend to place technologies on a Cartesian plane of progress where the gradient from analog to digital is seen as a linear function of time.  Video as a medium defies this tendency.  Despite its arrival nearly a century after film, and its obvious remediation of the medium, video is a purely analog medium consisting of continuous flows of electric signal.
+
[[File:Fake_timeshifting.png|200px|thumb|left|YouTube inherits the triangular "play" symbol from the VCR]]We automatically, and mistakenly, tend to place technologies on a Cartesian plane of progress where the gradient from analog to digital is seen as a linear function of time.  Video as a medium defies this tendency.  Despite its arrival nearly a century after film, and its obvious remediation of the medium, video is a purely analog medium consisting of continuous flows of electric signal.
 
* TiVo
 
* TiVo
 
* YouTube
 
* YouTube

Revision as of 19:40, 25 April 2010

Bootleg video is a practice. It is not the physical tapes that are distributed, created, copied, consumed, and sought-after. It is not the mechanism of adhering video signal to magnetic tape in a sealed plastic cartridge. It is not the television itself, the VCR, or the camcorder. Nor is it the adventure of creating tangible documentation of what otherwise would have never been known to others. Bootleg video is not any of these things, yet its practice necessitates all of these things. In brief, bootleg video is the practice of seeing what one is not meant to see, through eyes enabled by the aforementioned technologies.

A Brief History of Magnetic Tape

German Magnetophon, the spoils of WWII
Magnetic tape technology was first developed in Germany in 1934 as a method of recording audio. It was introduced to the US by means of espionage— it was not until the end of World War II that a German Magnetophon tape deck was discovered by army specialists and reverse-engineered. (Hilderbrand 38) Over the next few decades, once fully introduced into the market, magnetic tape succeeded phonoraphy and film in both the militaristic and broadcast sphere because the medium privileges verisimilitude and speed. It is worth noting that unlike the phonograph, which was originally designed for the business class, magnetic tape as a method of inscription is of militaristic origin. Its passage from the military complex, to its eventual adaptation by national radio and television industries, unmasks the medium as a method of controlling unidirectional flows of content from a central hub to its various nodes.

Visuality and the Technical Exigencies of Video

Electronic Signal

  • catoptrics/dioptrics

A visual medium containing no images

  • P- and I-frames/scanlines/half-images
  • No linearity

Publics United through Timeshifting

The history of bootleg video begins not with television, but with radio. Magnetic tape's acoustic fidelity and ease of reproduction compelled radio stations to pre-record their programming for later broadcast. According to legend, Bing Crosby was one of the first advocates for pre-recording radio shows onto magnetic tape: his radio show's time slot was in direct competition with his regularly-scheduled golf game. (Hilderbrand 38) Thus networks were introduced, via magnetic tape, to the concept of timeshifting. The practice of timeshifting did more than appease the sensibilities of big-ring performers: it allows for viewers from different timezones to experience a televised event at the same time, thus synchronizing viewership. It is from network timeshifting of televised programing that the notion of "Prime Time" broadcasting arises. Thus timeshifting created the temporal possibility for a new mode of relation between networks and the television viewing public, forever changing the topology of the home, the private sphere, by linking it to the network and synchronizing its flows. As Vilém Flusser points out, this type of unidirectional communication is "'fascistic' rather than 'dialogic'." (83) Once the commercially-viable VCR democratized timeshifting, bootleg video emerged as the negative image of prime time television. Where the national viewing public was enabled and maintained by timeshifting televised programing at a centralized level controlled by the networks, bootleg video fan cultures were equally enabled by the timeshifting power wielded by each individual. Bootleg video as a practice is characterized by the democratization of the timeshifting process. Thus, it remediates the broadcast model propagated by the television networks, yet provides a way of multiplexing the vectors of transmission. Bootleg video tapes themselves are indeed "projectors of alternative worlds accessible to all human beings." (Flusser, 84)

  • Zizek and the super-ego directive to "enjoy"
  • Flusser and the fingertips that select (remote control)
  • bootleggers bring un-author-ized products to market where they would normally exist
  • timeshifting and betamax decision
  • the Law

The Camcorder, the VCR, and the Repositioning of the Viewing Subject

As the old adage goes, a visual medium's success is measured by how readily the medium can be used to make, distribute, and experience pornography. This saying, however glib, does contain some truth as it pertains to video— video radically redefined and redeployed the viewing subject in several key ways that acted on the libido directly. Bootleg video practice is a fecund site where modes of viewership, modes of distribution, relations between viewers, and even the content itself are reoriented around libidinal impulses.

Surveillance, Sousveillence

  • rodney king
  • cctv aesthetics
  • foucault
  • flash-forward to "citizen journalism"

Transferal of Jouissance

  • the "pervert" who films
  • pamela & tommy lee

Palimpsest of Jouissance

"Stories from the friends next door they never told..."
Still from the infamous Pamela & Tommy Lee video
  • the "pervert" who watches
  • the underground tape railroad

The Freedom of Timeshifting

  • the VCR will watch for you
  • nationalism & shared time

Haptic Vision

Bootleg video reveals vision to be haptic. Its emergence onto the scene consequently redefines the eye in relation to its perceived agency and abilities vis-a-vis a visual medium. As Crary suggests, the eye was once a considered to be a passive or "neutral receiver" in the face of painting. The advent of psychophysical analysis and film forced this model to be reevaluated. In establishing that the same ocular faculty responsible for rendering the "imaginary" cohesive sequence of film from the "real" cut-up sequence of still images is the same faculty responsible for creating afterimages, the eye was upgraded to a more participatory or cooperative status during the film-viewing process. Bootleg video forces an upgrade of the mechanism once again: methods of tape viewership (pausing, rewinding, playing, dubbing, enjoying) necessarily involve the destruction of the medium. The eye is now an active, even aggressive, partner in the consumption of media.

Amorous Media/Promiscuous Media

Un-author-ized Media

  • Barthes death of the author
  • histories of viewership
  • locations/origins of artifacts

Fake Timeshifting

YouTube inherits the triangular "play" symbol from the VCR
We automatically, and mistakenly, tend to place technologies on a Cartesian plane of progress where the gradient from analog to digital is seen as a linear function of time. Video as a medium defies this tendency. Despite its arrival nearly a century after film, and its obvious remediation of the medium, video is a purely analog medium consisting of continuous flows of electric signal.
  • TiVo
  • YouTube
  • Skeuomorph of play/stop/etc. buttons, but without the power to timeshift, these visual nods to the older medium are hollow
  • Creation of technologies/creation of Users (Vismann)

References

  • Crary, Jonathan. Techniques of the Observer: On Vision and Modernity in the Nineteenth Century. The MIT Press. 1990.
  • Flusser, Vilém. The Shape of Things: A Philosophy of Design. Reaction Books. 1999.
  • Hilderbrand, Lucas. Inherent Vice: Bootleg Histories of Videotape and Copyright. Duke University Press. 2009.
  • Kittler, Fredrich. Gramophone, Film, Typewriter. Stanford University Press, 1999.
  • Spielmann, Yvonne. Video: The Reflexive Medium. The MIT Press. 2008.
  • Vismann, Cornelia and Markus Krajewski. "Computer Juridisms" in Grey Room, Winter 2008.
  • Zizek, Slavoj. "The Interpassive Subject" in Traveses. Centre Georges Pompidou. 1998. [1]